<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deimos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/HiBlog/2009/03/09/deimos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/HiBlog/2009/03/09/deimos/</link>
	<description>High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:49:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Brown 3488</title>
		<link>http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/HiBlog/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-6669</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Brown 3488</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/HiBlog/?p=240#comment-6669</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much HiRISE team.

I really love these Deimos observations with HiRISE, another formal request of mine to the HiRISE team carried out &amp; am NOT disappointed. Superb.

The more I see Phobos &amp; Deimos like this, the more I think that they are captured primitive asteroids. I suspect now that their type D status is confirmed, now that we have detailed HiRISE observations along side the CRISM observations a while back.

What is obvious is that Deimos using the same filters is not as &#039;red&#039; as Phobos. To me that is a fundamental difference. Regolith composition slightly different? Different texture (certainly shown in the Viking 2 imagery)????

Now to convince if possible ESA to send Mars Express close by Deimos, over the anti Mars side &amp; compare with these HiRISE observations.

These are the best Deimos observations since the Viking 2 orbiter in October 1977. That is nearly 32.5 years ago!!!!!!!

Are Phobos &amp; Deimos indeed captured asteroids, possibly originating in the outer part of the Asteroid Belt? 

Are they indeed similar to some of Jupiter&#039;s members of the outermost retrograde group of small moons such as Pasiphae, Ananke or Sinope? 

If so, do they share a common origin?

Andrew Brown 3488.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much HiRISE team.</p>
<p>I really love these Deimos observations with HiRISE, another formal request of mine to the HiRISE team carried out &amp; am NOT disappointed. Superb.</p>
<p>The more I see Phobos &amp; Deimos like this, the more I think that they are captured primitive asteroids. I suspect now that their type D status is confirmed, now that we have detailed HiRISE observations along side the CRISM observations a while back.</p>
<p>What is obvious is that Deimos using the same filters is not as &#8216;red&#8217; as Phobos. To me that is a fundamental difference. Regolith composition slightly different? Different texture (certainly shown in the Viking 2 imagery)????</p>
<p>Now to convince if possible ESA to send Mars Express close by Deimos, over the anti Mars side &amp; compare with these HiRISE observations.</p>
<p>These are the best Deimos observations since the Viking 2 orbiter in October 1977. That is nearly 32.5 years ago!!!!!!!</p>
<p>Are Phobos &amp; Deimos indeed captured asteroids, possibly originating in the outer part of the Asteroid Belt? </p>
<p>Are they indeed similar to some of Jupiter&#8217;s members of the outermost retrograde group of small moons such as Pasiphae, Ananke or Sinope? </p>
<p>If so, do they share a common origin?</p>
<p>Andrew Brown 3488.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

